RWA Global Application: Driven by Technology and Regulation with Challenges and Opportunities Coexisting

RWA Global Practices: The Dynamic Game between Technology and Regulation

In the context of the digital economy reconstructing the global financial ecosystem, the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) is becoming a forefront of financial innovation. This article systematically analyzes the global practices of RWA in core areas such as government bonds, real estate, and carbon credits, deeply exploring the breakthroughs and conflicts between technology and regulation, and making forward-looking projections on future development paths.

25 Years Q3 Outlook: How can RWA balance technology, regulation, and market from the perspectives of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and globally?

Core Tracks and Representative Projects

Tokenization of Government Bonds: Institution-Led Compliance Experiment

Bond tokenization is the most popular direction for RWA at present. In a high interest rate environment, government bonds anchored by blockchain technology can enhance trading flexibility, reduce costs, and increase transparency, providing investors with low-risk on-chain investment opportunities.

The European and American markets achieve automatic distribution of government bond yields and optimization of compliance costs through smart contracts. Asset management giant BlackRock's BUIDL fund adopts the ERC-1400 standard, reducing SEC compliance costs by 30%, and after three months of issuance, the managed scale exceeds $500 million. Goldman Sachs' GS DAP platform issues $12 billion in digital bonds, shortening the issuance cycle from 2 weeks to 48 hours and improving settlement efficiency by 60%.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority issued approximately HKD 7.8 billion worth of digital bonds through the CMU system, covering HKD, RMB, USD, and EUR. Hong Kong is also promoting the Ensemble sandbox program to explore asset tokenization applications such as fixed income and investment funds. Through a pilot on the Goldman Sachs GA DAP platform, HKD 800 million tokenized green bonds were successfully issued, with settlement costs reduced by 40%.

Mainland China is currently exploring asset securitization mainly through tools such as REITs and promoting policies for data assets to be included in the balance sheet. The Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange has launched a blockchain carbon trading platform to achieve on-chain registration and trading of national carbon market quotas.

25-Year Q3 Outlook: How RWA Balances Technology, Regulation, and Market from a Global Perspective including Mainland and Hong Kong

Real Estate Tokenization: Challenges of Liquidity Reconstruction and Legal Adaptation

Real estate tokenization faces challenges such as ownership identification and liquidity enhancement. In the U.S., RealT has lowered the investment threshold for real estate to $50, but some transactions have been suspended due to mismatched on-chain and off-chain ownership. Propy utilizes AI-driven real estate transactions, saving 40% on labor costs, but the real estate registration systems of various EU countries have not yet integrated with blockchain.

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission allows the tokenization of REIT shares, and the Munch project pilots the splitting of revenue NFTs for dining stores, reducing the financing cycle by 50%. The Ensemble Sandbox will launch REIT tokenization tests in 2025, aiming to lower the entry threshold from HKD 1 million to HKD 500,000. Longxin Technology's charging pile RWA project has obtained RMB 100 million in cross-border financing, with data recorded on the Ant Blockchain.

The Shenzhen real estate registration system in mainland China is piloting blockchain technology, with 30% of property rights information on-chain. The Left Bank Xinhui Agriculture RWA project integrates agricultural product data with carbon credits, completing financing of 10 million yuan.

Carbon Credit Tokenization: The Compliance Game of Environmental Finance

Tokenization of carbon credits faces challenges such as cross-border standard recognition and data credibility. The Toucan Protocol has a cumulative trading volume of $4 billion, but is limited by Verra's physical retirement requirements, adopting a "fixed" token model. Klima DAO promotes emission reductions through a carbon credit staking mechanism, but there is a risk of double counting in carbon offsets.

The tokenization platform built by Ant Group in Hong Kong enables monetary transactions of carbon credits and green bonds, with cross-border transactions of blockchain green certificates for residential photovoltaic projects in Brazil expected to be completed by 2025. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has included carbon credits in the core pilot areas of the Ensemble sandbox.

The Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange in Mainland China has launched a blockchain carbon trading platform, enabling on-chain registration and trading of national carbon market quotas. The "Management Measures for Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Transactions" allow project-level carbon assets to be placed on the blockchain.

2025 Q3 Outlook: How RWA Balances Technology, Regulation, and Market from a Global Perspective, Including Mainland and Hong Kong, China?

Breakthroughs and Conflicts in Technical-Regulatory Collaboration

Compliance Architecture Innovation: Offshore SPV and On-chain Sandbox

Project Guardian, led by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, focuses on the innovative application of blockchain technology in cross-border financial transactions. By introducing Chainlink oracles, it successfully established a bridge connecting off-chain data with on-chain smart contracts, reducing the time for cross-border settlement from the "T+2" model to a matter of minutes.

The second phase of the Hong Kong Ensemble Sandbox has launched a pilot project for "regulatory rule codification," utilizing Ant Chain's "cross-chain data verification platform" to achieve "available but not visible" asset data across different jurisdictions.

Mainland China relies on the "regulatory sandbox" mechanism and the advantages of top-level design to achieve deep coupling of technology and regulation in the digital yuan pilot. Through a "dual-layer operation" framework, the central bank leads the technical standards and underlying protocols, while commercial banks and technology companies are responsible for the implementation of scenarios.

Technical Bottlenecks and Solutions

The reliability of oracle data is a key challenge. In 2022, the DeFi lending protocol Inverse Finance suffered from a design flaw in the oracle TWAP mechanism, resulting in the illegal misappropriation of $14.75 million in assets. Chainlink has raised the cost of node misconduct to over $980 million through economic incentives and cryptographic proof.

Ant Group in Hong Kong is exploring the "IoT terminal + multi-party secure computing" system in the "Langxin Project", controlling data latency to within 2 minutes, which improves reliability by 4 times compared to traditional single oracle solutions.

Cross-chain interoperability is another core bottleneck. The Ensemble sandbox project led by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority introduces the LayerZero full-chain protocol, achieving instant cross-chain message transmission and verification through a "light node verification + oracle collaboration" mechanism. The "Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area cross-chain infrastructure" pilot in mainland China is based on consortium chain technology, achieving underlying technical compatibility among the three regional blockchain platforms through a unified cross-chain communication standard.

Strengthening the security of smart contracts is crucial. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission requires that the smart contracts of RWA projects must undergo annual security audits by licensed auditing firms. The Cyberspace Administration of China has launched a "smart contract filing system", requiring on-chain contracts to pass safety inspections by the National Internet Emergency Center.

25-Year Q3 Outlook: How can RWA balance technology, regulation, and the market from the perspectives of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and globally?

Liquidity Dilemma and Market Divergence

The private credit market expansion faces challenges. Maple Finance has issued over $2 billion in loans, but 80% of the funds flow to crypto-native institutions, with traditional enterprises' penetration rate below 5%. The Hong Kong global shipping business network (GSBN) has compressed the trade financing cycle from 15 days to 3 days through a pilot program for electronic bill of lading tokenization. The mainland online commercial bank's blockchain supply chain finance platform serves over 100,000 small and medium-sized enterprises, with the approval time for a single loan reduced to 30 minutes.

The liquidity enhancement of non-standard assets is another challenge. The average daily trading volume of art tokens decreases by 80% within three months after the initial issuance. The Hong Kong Munch project constructs a "compliant stablecoin exchange + cross-border income rights registration" dual-layer structure, which increases the average daily trading volume of dining revenue tokens by 35%. The mainland Left Bank Xinhui agricultural RWA project adopts a "government-guided fund + structured layering" mechanism to optimize the risk-return structure.

25-Year Q3 Outlook: How can RWA balance technology, regulation, and market from the perspectives of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and globally?

RWA Legal Compliance Framework and Case Analysis

Domestic Legal Challenges and Compliance Paths

Regulatory prohibitions on token issuance financing ( ICO ), RWA projects must settle using fiat or compliant stablecoins. Cross-border financing must comply with capital project management regulations, such as raising overseas funds through the QFLP model to establish FAGP. Domestic projects often raise funds through private equity fund managers' filing, using the private equity fund model.

Hong Kong Sandbox Mechanism and Cross-Border Compliance

The Ensemble sandbox provides a compliant testing environment for RWA projects. The RWA project of Langxin Technology charging piles adopts the "asset chain + transaction chain" architecture, where the asset chain records operational data based on the mainland alliance chain, and the transaction chain relies on the Hong Kong licensed blockchain platform to connect with foreign funds.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority's regulatory framework for stablecoins is mutually recognized as equivalent to the EU MiCA framework, allowing licensed issuers to apply for an EU EMT license based on their Hong Kong qualifications. The draft "Stablecoin Ordinance" requires that issuers of fiat-backed stablecoins or stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar must apply for a license and maintain a 100% high liquidity reserve.

25-Year Q3 Outlook: How can RWA balance technology, regulation, and market from a global perspective including Mainland China and Hong Kong?

Comparison of International Compliance Frameworks and Interoperability Dilemma

The global RWA regulatory system shows regional characteristics:

  1. Securities Dominant ( United States ): The SEC implements securities regulation on RWA tokens based on the Howey Test, while the CFTC is responsible for futures trading regulation of commodity attribute tokens.

  2. Sandbox experimental type ( Hong Kong ): Implementing "technology-neutral" regulation based on the Securities and Futures Ordinance, allowing security tokens to break traditional rule restrictions within the Ensemble sandbox.

  3. Unified Legislative Type ( EU ): The MiCA framework classifies RWA tokens into Asset-Referenced Tokens ( ARTs ), Electronic Money Tokens ( EMTs ), and Hybrid Crypto Assets, requiring issuers to establish EU entities and submit compliant white papers.

  4. Emerging experimental ( Dubai, Singapore ): adopting a phased sandbox mechanism or small exemption policies, but with higher technical requirements for on-chain KYC and other technologies.

The interoperability dilemma is manifested in aspects such as protocol layer fragmentation, jurisdictional conflicts, and fragmentation of liquidity pools. Among the top 50 global RWA protocols, only 12% support compliant interactions across jurisdictions, with the daily cross-border trading volume accounting for less than 5%.

25-Year Q3 Outlook: How RWA Balances Technology, Regulation, and Market from a Global Perspective, including Mainland and Hong Kong

Future Path Forecast: Technology-Driven vs Regulatory Priority

Technology-driven ( Singapore-Hong Kong collaborative paradigm )

  1. Evolution of Programmable Regulatory Sandboxes: The second phase of Hong Kong's Ensemble Sandbox has launched a pilot for "regulatory rule codification", which is expected to reduce the cross-border approval cycle for RWA from 45 days to 7 days.

  2. Oracle Network Upgrade: Chainlink CCIP technology will control cross-chain transaction price differences within 5%. A hybrid oracle network of "satellite remote sensing + IoT" will be deployed in the mainland to enhance the data reliability of green RWA projects.

Regulatory Priority Type ( United States, European Union - Mainland, Hong Kong Benchmark Paradigm )

  1. International mutual recognition of compliance frameworks: The Hong Kong "Stablecoin Regulation Draft" and the U.S. "GENIUS Act" converge in areas such as reserve requirements, which is expected to promote a globally coordinated RWA compliance ecosystem.

  2. Innovative Settlement of Distributed Ledger: Hong Kong Monetary Authority pilots digital Hong Kong dollar ( e-HKD ) for real-time settlement of tokenized assets ( T+1/2). The mainland deepens the digital renminbi ( e-CNY ) with Hong Kong's "multiple central bank digital currency interoperability" project.

Hybrid Path ( Institution-led Global Network )

  1. Collaboration between international institutions and Chinese financial technology: BlackRock's Onyx platform integrates the BUIDL Fund and JPM Coin to build a network for collateralized lending of U.S. Treasury bonds. Ant Group's financial technology and UBS launched the Asia-Pacific New Energy RWA platform, with a financing scale reaching $500 million by 2025.

  2. Compliance Integration of SWIFT and Blockchain: The SWIFT GPI pilot project involving Hong Kong connects to the Chainlink oracle, achieving an automated financing process of "bank guarantees - smart contract triggers."

Outlook for Q3 2025: How to balance technology, regulation, and market for RWA from a global perspective including Mainland China and Hong Kong?

RWA Market Chaos and Risk Warnings

  1. "Aircoins" and "Ponzi schemes" are rampant: some projects use virtual
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHighvip
· 1h ago
There is too much regulation; they control everything.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 8h ago
Don't say it, it's just that buying the dip fundamentally changes the deepest trap.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingSeriousvip
· 8h ago
What the heck, it's better to just do Cryptocurrency Trading directly.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leakervip
· 8h ago
The pro in asset management are all focusing on RWA.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 8h ago
It's quite interesting. I've been playing for so long and I haven't really heard of it.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fightervip
· 8h ago
Is it really that simple to have government bonds on-chain? The regulators haven't figured it out yet.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarianvip
· 8h ago
Real estate speculation and government bonds can both be on the blockchain. My bull run is coming back again.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 8h ago
This wave will definitely profit in three years! The tokenization of government bonds will be the next hot spot for the next three years.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)