Gate動態廣場創作者星火招募計劃限時開啓!
無論你是加密KOL、項目方還是媒體,現在入駐發帖,即可搶先解鎖:Gate百萬流量曝光、超$10,000月度激勵獎金、深度生態合作資源等專屬福利!
參與攻略:
1️⃣ 立即填寫申請表:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdStzGVu-fj14EM07-cVLYf0pk0axwMQbS-0tk1YK3Y6x5Vew/viewform?usp=header
2️⃣ 審核通過,開啓創作之旅!
🎁 活動獎金獎勵:
基礎創作激勵:參與動態內容挖礦,輕鬆發帖即可獲得高達10%手續費返佣!
$10,000/月內容激勵池:每週精選TOP 10優質內容,入選即獎勵 $50 USDT/篇!
爆款內容獎勵:閱讀量≥3萬可獲得額外 $50 USDT,閱讀量≥10萬可獲得額外 $100 USDT!
🎁 生態合作&流量曝光權益:
空投/AMA/白名單等項目合作優先權
參與Gate Labs早期項目評測,贏潛在種子輪獎勵
APP首頁推薦位、官方宣發、峯會嘉賓等資源加持
本活動長期開放,首批入駐動態廣場用戶權益優先!
立即申請,搶佔流量紅利,輕鬆發帖賺高額獎勵,項目方更有生態扶持等你來享!
Vitalik introduces ‘pluralistic’ IDs to protect privacy in digital identity systems
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has introduced a new kind of digital identity system dubbed “pluralistic identity,” arguing it could protect privacy while enabling fair participation in digital life.
In a blog post published Sunday, Buterin explored the promise and pitfalls of zero-knowledge (ZK) proof-wrapped IDs, warning that even privacy-preserving systems can carry serious risks if they rigidly enforce one identity per person.
The Ethereum (ETH) mastermind noted that many new digital ID projects use zero-knowledge proofs to let users prove they have a valid ID without revealing personal details. Examples include World ID, which has surpassed 10 million users, Taiwan’s digital ID project, and European Union initiatives increasingly adopting ZK technology.
“ZK-wrapping solves a lot of important problems,” he wrote, but warned that “ZK-wrapped ID still has risks,” especially because enforcing one ID per person can undermine pseudonymity and expose users to coercion.
Single digital IDs could kill pseudonymity
One key risk Buterin identified is that platforms could force users into a single, trackable identity, eliminating the ability to maintain separate pseudonymous profiles. “In the real world, pseudonymity generally requires having multiple accounts,” he said.
Without this flexibility, he argued, users could find themselves in a world where “all of your activity must de-facto be under a single public identity,” heightening dangers from government or employer surveillance.
Buterin also rejected the idea of using “proof of wealth” alone as an anti-Sybil measure, saying it excludes people unable to pay and concentrates power among the wealthy. “The theoretical ideal is something in the middle, where you can get N identities at a cost of N²,” he said.
Related: Wintermute’s ‘CrimeEnjoyor’ to flag Ethereum’s wallet-draining contracts
Buterin proposes pluralistic IDs
To achieve a flexible approach, Buterin proposed pluralistic identity systems, where no single authority controls identity issuance, as the “best realistic solution.”
He explained these could be explicit, using social-graph-based verification like Circles, or implicit, relying on multiple ID providers — government documents, social platforms, and others — so no one ID gains near-total market share.
“Any form of pluralistic identity… is naturally more error-tolerant,” he noted, pointing out that this flexibility helps stateless individuals or those unable to access traditional IDs.
Ultimately, Buterin argued the best outcome would merge one-per-person identity schemes with social-graph systems to bootstrap diverse, global identity networks.
“If their market share gets too close to 100%, they shift the world… to a one-per-person model, which has worse properties,” he warned, stressing that only pluralistic identity can balance privacy, inclusivity, and resistance to abuse.
Magazine: GENIUS Act reopens the door for a Meta stablecoin, but will it work?